• Homepage
• Outline
• Appendix E : Participation
• History
• SAES-422 (Report & Minutes)
• Meeting Info
• Participants Directory
• Tech Committee Officers
• Publications
• Photo Album
• Links
• Additional Documents
• All Projects

NCR201: Integrated Pest Management

Duration:

October 01, 2001 to September 30, 2006

Administrative Advisor(s):

Wendy Wintersteen (IOW) - Research

NIFA Reps:

Michael Fitzner

Statement of Issue(s) and Justification:

This is a proposal to replace the previous NCS-3 and IPM Coordinators Joint Committee. The role of this NCR committee will continue in its previous context as a service and advisory committee to the regional administrative structure and to the pest management staff at CSREES- USDA. The advisory role will be in multiple areas including drafting an RFP for North Central competitive IPM Grant Program and advising CSREES on North Central regional needs and priorities as it relates to National IPM Programs. This process is driven by the requirements (AREERA) for new research guidelines for all multistate activities.

Losses due to pests and costs associated with management/control of pests represents significant costs to production agriculture. Pests and pesticide use also represent a significant challenge in areas of public health, manufacturing, food processing, urban and residential landscape(s) and the environment. Pest management faces major potential challenges from current actions by EPA in implementing FQPA, i.e., the potential loss of pesticides that are critical in several use areas. The use of genetic engineering to provide an alternative control tactic to move away from traditional pesticides also face serious challenges in the public arena. This alternative method of control is also under serious challenge from EPA and, is being scrutinized by other federal agencies.

The diversity of pests and multiple impacts emphasize the importance of a multistate and multi- disciplinary approach. Leveraging the knowledge and resources of integrated pest management expertise in the North Central Region is key to addressing pest problems. Leveraging will be accomplished through communication and interaction with other entities that are involved in various aspects of pest management, for example, IR-4.

This regional multistate committee would provide a framework for bringing together IPM researchers and educators with diverse backgrounds to explore common issues, offer insights and identify priorities. This committee will develop documentation via an RFP for IPM research, education programs and activities in the North Central region. This committee will also provide a forum for information sharing with the North Central Pest Management Centers. The continuation of the NCS-3 function will provide a base for interacting with the North Central Pest Management Center which was established in late 2000. Each region has a committee as is being proposed in this document to serve their respective region. Plans and RFPs are shared across the regions. Representatives from each region are on a National IPM committee to provide coordination and input to CSREES. The National Committee meets minimally once a year in D.C.

Objectives

1. Enhance multi disciplinary, multistate communication.
2. Review priority needs for IPM.
3. Foster cooperative programmatic development with other relevant entities/organizations, including North Central Pest Management Center, IR-4, etc.
4. Develop the RFP for the North Central IPM Grants Program for review by USDA-CSREES.

Procedures and Activities

Expected Outcomes and Impacts:

• Research and education programs that enhance implementation of integrated pest management systems. Pests do not recognize state boundaries. One outcome would be an expectation for the committee to foster the development of multistate activity to initiate a research or education program.
• Development of "standardized" approaches for assessing IPM across the NC region and surrounding areas, for example, IPM measurement tools designed to assess IPM adoption. AREERA requires reporting of accomplishments. Draft protocols will be reviewed and refined to assist states in meeting reporting requirements.
• Routine use of user-friendly computer technologies for implementing IPM as well as increasing availability of information. As an information sharing committee there will be an exchange of ideas and technology for use by member states. For example, arrangements could be made to share evolving technology, joint web sites, etc.
• Increased collaboration with both public agencies, private industries as well as other stakeholders. Inviting regional EPA, SARE and consultants to meetings, for example, would potentially broaden the base for IPM both in terms of needs identification and potential for resource enhancement.
• Identification and recommendations on key and emerging IPM issues including the uses of new world wide web based communication tools and implementation of insect resistance management plans as more transgenic cultivars are deployed for pest management purposes.
• Develop a draft RFP for the North Central Regional IPM Grants Program. The draft RFP is reviewed, approved or modified by USDA-CSREES. An RFP may be used for more than one year but would be reviewed annually by the Committee. The Regional IPM Grants Program is a federally funded (CSREES) program and as such its management is in their domain. The region serves as an advisor and facilitator to USDA-CSREES.

Project Participation:

Include a completed Appendix E form

Educational Plan:

see outcomes/impacts

Governance:

The recommended Standard Governance for multistate research activities include the election of a Chair, a Chair-elect, and a Secretary. All officers are to be elected for at least two-year terms to provide continuity. Administrative guidance will be provided by an assigned Administrative Advisor and a CSREES Representative.

Literature Cited:

Attachments:

none

Internal Linkages:

External Linkages:

Signatures:

s:/Wendy Wintersteen

Back to Top